Original:
Turrentine’s use of
rhetorical strategies are the most successful when the audience of the article
is liberal. Although he uses enough context, factual evidence, and
credible sources, his relatively informal tone combined with the deeply moral
nature of the issue will be a turn-off to those who oppose the Pope’s words.
Still, when finding and analyzing the rhetorical strategies for the
audience of an environmentally active newsgroup, the audience Turrentine writes
for is likely to be persuaded of the change in cultural climate the Pope will
produce. His strong appeals to the moral beliefs of the audience, his credible
analysis of culture in the United States, and his great attention to clear
factual detail are his most effective strategies.
Turrentine’s
connection to his liberal audience is his strongest rhetorical advantage. Writing for the audience of an
environmentally active newsgroup allows for Turrentine to focus on convincing
his audience of the potential of the Pope’s actions to benefit climate change
rather than convincing his audience climate change exists. Although he used a comprehensive amount of
context, factual evidence, and credible sources, his informal tone discussing
such a deeply complicated moral issue is a turn-off to those who are conflicted
by or oppose the Pope’s actions. Still,
when analyzing how his rhetorical strategies affect his majority liberal audience,
his strong moral appeals to the audience, credible analysis of US culture, and
his attention to providing clear factual details are his most effective
strategies.
No comments:
Post a Comment